Date: 5 Sept 14
By: Frank Gue, B.Sc., MBA, P.Eng.,
2252 Joyce St.,
Burlington, ON L7R 2B5
905 634 9538
For: Letters, The Spec
Re: “Seven public Trustee candidates … “ today’s “Local”
Good day, Lee.
The seven Trustee candidates that have banded together are clearly alarmed at an opaque and arbitrary process of school closures in Hamilton.
Their concern is well founded. It is by no means clear that “bigger is better”.
A small study in Burlington found that small schools both are less expensive per student and yield better test results per dollar of cost than large schools.
An Internet search pops-up several studies supporting small schools. Example: ‘ (and the Burlington study) found that the benefits of “small” taper off around 500-600. “1,000 is the absolute upper limit for high schools and 500 is the absolute upper limit for K-8 or K-6 elementary schools” to quote one such research result. Most sources, along with Burlington, suggest that 300-400 is an optimum size. 2,000 becomes “a monstrosity”.
Ms. Warry-Poljanski makes a key point: “Trustees should be spokespeople to the Board, [instead of for the Board]”. Right-on; but any citizen who tries to suggest improvements to the Education system finds that many Education staffers do not welcome citizen (eg Board) “interference”, and seem to be operating under the hidden agenda that says, “We’ll be here after you’re gone. We know best and you don’t. Just raise the money and go away.”
There is a groundswell of citizens no longer willing to go away, and we wish the seven candidates well in their plan to have the system responding to the people rather than the other way around in matters like school closings.
– 30 –