Economist re the Financial Transaction Tax

Date: 12 Feb 15

By: Frank Gue, B.Sc., MBA, P.Eng.,

2252 Joyce St.,

Burlington, ON L7R 2B5

905 634 9538

For: Editors, The Economist,

London, UK

Re: “Still kicking”, p 63 of Jan. 312 edition, re the FTT “bad

idea” 168 words

Dear Editors:

Little will be heard of this until we read that the financial transactions tax (FTT, Tobin Tax) has once more been dropped, owing to its promoters’ inability to get past the outrage of financiers whose oxen would be gored. Indeed, the impracticality of getting agreement among scores of jurisdictions dooms such efforts.

One way of getting one of the main benefits of an FTT (suppressing the violent oscillatory movements of capital into and out of an economy) was pioneered by the Chinese: impose a small delay upon every financial transaction.

This would be non-significant to any investor legitimately wishing to finance a productive, value-added enterprise; but would destroy the ability of an HFT to cause destructive waves of microsecond-spaced, no-value-added transactions, because an HFT’s profits depend upon light-speed turnover of funds.

Further, it would require little agreement with other jurisdictions, and would tilt FDI movements in the direction of productive, long-term investment rather than toward non-productive speculation.

There’s life in the FTT yet.

– end –

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s